George Lucas is infamous for going back and mucking about with his work (and indeed the work of others.) Years after the original Star Wars trilogy was released he went back through them and re-edited the films in order to 'improve them.' To many die-hard fans of the series this decision was offensive. The films were already released. They were great. What more did they need? The trilogy had stood the test of time and had etched itself into the public consciousness. They were adored. For some reason though Lucas felt that he could take these great films and make them even better. There's a saying in the film world, "Great films are never finished they are just abandoned." Meaning there is literally no end to what you can do with a film. You can edit and re-edit. You can do re-shoots. You can do voice over and change the soundtrack. There comes a point though when you must simply stop. Like raising a child you cannot continue to parent for an eternity. You have to let them out from under your wing and hope to God they can fly on their own knowing all you have taught them.
Lucas doesn't adhere to this creed. Like an overprotective parent he keeps calling his children up and trying to bottle feed them the elemental skills they have already proven to everyone else they have acquired. This insecurity with his work didn't begin with Star Wars. It began with THX 1138 his very first feature film. THX 1138, a story about a dystopian future where sex is illegal, began life as a short film created while Lucas was a student. The short film can be viewed on the special edition DVD of THX 1138. It's a finished and published work of fiction. Why then did Lucas feel the need to revisit and rehash this old story? Instead of allowing the work to exist as it was he felt the need to take it back and re-create it. Are you seeing the parallels? This is the worst kind of thing you can do to these projects. Finishing something and letting it stand on it's own two feet is the necessarily final step in creating a work of art. What if Michaelangelo had returned to the Sistine Chapel years after painting the ceiling and told Pope Julius II that he had some improvements to make? Pope Julius II would have, if he had any sense, told him flatly "no." He and the rest of the congregation had grown to love the work of art. Any work of significance offers the viewer a link to the mental state the creator was in when the piece was made. The flaws are a part of it's story and offer insight into the steps of his journey the artist was on. Any ideas that are outdated offer a glimpse into the mindset of the culture when the work was created.
At the end of the semester we screened our video in front of all the other students and critiqued each others films. I received a lot of positive feedback but also a lot of very fair criticism. With all the commentary from students and teachers rolling through my mind I went and sat down with my school mentor Evan Koons. We talked about the problems with the film. I told him I wanted to try again. I said, 'I think (and still do) that the basic premise of the story has merit and that with the knowledge I had gained from the process I could make a better film the second time around.' Evan told me that under no circumstances should I do any such thing. The project existed, it was finished and to revisit the film in any attempt to improve it would only invalidate the lessons I had learned in the process.
When you look back on something you have made the flaws in it serve as a reminder to you. They are the mile markers of your journey as an artist. There's very little interesting or glamorous about mile marker 5 on a journey of 500 miles, but you have to pass it. If after every road trip you went on you said to yourself, " I could do that better, I could have achieved a higher MPG, I could have stopped fewer times, if I had planned it right we would have eaten at that fun little diner and not Taco Bell," you would never drive anywhere new. You would just keep going back to the same roads over and over again revisiting the exact same trip, trying to do the same thing even better. Voltaire said, "The perfect is the enemy of the good" If you refuse to settle for anything but perfection you'll miss all the good opportunities life has to offer. You'll probably never complete anything either. I'm not saying don't have high standards of work but there is in all things a balance to strike.
Have you ever picked up a paper you wrote in early college or high school and read it again years later? It's painful. You can't see the person you are now having written the things you did then. Do you decide to retake the class in a attempt to do the exact same thing better? Of course not. You recognize that you are a better writer now, a more well rounded individual, and you ascribe these changes to the kind of experiences you have had... such as writing that paper.
So Lucas didn't just decide on a whim to go back and make the Special Edition Star Wars films, he started his career by going backwards. Is it possible that he would have made a terrible film as his first instead of the mediocre THX 1138 had he chosen not to attempt his remake? Yes of course it is. The point though is this. If you spend your whole artistic career going back to what you've already finished and reopening those old wounds you will never make anything new. So I implore you; learn from George,
let it be.

